Share on Facebook
Share on X
Share on LinkedIn
By Scott Scherr
Partner

On an oilfield, a single spark can ignite vapors that workers cannot see or smell. Preventing that fire is usually a shared responsibility, and employers, site operators, drilling companies, contractors, and equipment manufacturers may all have duties tied to the hazards they create or control. When any of these parties fails to address a known risk, several companies may share liability for the resulting injuries.

Why Can Oilfield Fires Become Catastrophic So Quickly?

Oilfields bring fuel, heat, pressure, machinery, and electrical systems into close proximity. Flammable vapors may collect around tanks, separators, pits, wellheads, or enclosed work areas. A spark from welding equipment, a damaged electrical connection, static electricity, or an overheated engine may provide the ignition source.

Once a fire starts, pressurized equipment and stored chemicals can intensify it. Workers may suffer catastrophic injuries such as severe burns, smoke inhalation, blast injuries, traumatic brain injuries, or fatal harm before they can reach a safe area.

Who Must Prevent Fires on an Oilfield?

Responsibility for an oilfield fire depends on who controlled the worksite, equipment, and activity that caused the fire. An investigation may focus on several parties.

  • The worker’s employer may be responsible for training employees, providing protective equipment, inspecting tools, and enforcing safe work practices.
  • The lease or site operator may control sitewide conditions, coordinate contractors, identify known hazards, and establish emergency procedures.
  • Drilling and service companies may be responsible for the equipment and operations under their control.
  • Contractors and subcontractors may create fire risks through welding, cutting, electrical work, maintenance, or chemical handling.
  • Equipment manufacturers or suppliers may face liability when defective machinery, valves, alarms, or fire suppression systems contribute to an incident.

More than one company may bear responsibility. OSHA’s multi-employer worksite policy recognizes that a company may create a hazard, expose workers to it, have authority to correct it, or exercise general control over the worksite. Those roles can overlap.

What Fire Prevention Measures Should Be in Place?

A sound prevention plan begins before anyone starts a hazardous task. Companies should assess where flammable gases or liquids may be released and keep possible ignition sources away from those areas.

Common safeguards include:

  • Gas detection and continuous atmospheric monitoring
  • Properly maintained electrical equipment
  • Grounding and bonding to control static discharge
  • Safe storage and transfer of combustible materials
  • Accessible extinguishers and functioning suppression systems
  • Clear evacuation routes and emergency communication plans
  • Equipment inspections and prompt repairs
  • Worker training on alarms, shutdown procedures, and escape routes

Hot work deserves particular attention. Welding, cutting, brazing, and grinding can throw sparks into areas that appear safe but contain hidden vapors or residue. OSHA’s welding and hot-work rules address fire prevention measures such as removing combustibles, using guards, and assigning fire watchers in certain conditions. Depending on the operation, a formal hot work permit may also be required by company policy or another applicable safety standard.

Which Fire Safety Failures May Support an Injury Claim?

Liability may arise when a company knew, or reasonably should have known, about a danger and failed to address it. Examples include ignoring gas-monitor alarms, allowing hot work without checking the atmosphere, using poorly maintained equipment, or failing to coordinate simultaneous operations.

A company might also disable an alarm to avoid interruptions, postpone a repair to keep production moving, or rely on a safety meeting that does not address the day’s actual work. These decisions can reveal whether the fire resulted from a preventable breakdown rather than an unavoidable accident.

How Is Responsibility Proven After an Oilfield Fire?

The origin of a fire may become harder to identify once damaged equipment is cleared away. A prompt investigation can preserve evidence such as:

  • Incident and OSHA reports
  • Hot work permits and job safety analyses
  • Gas-monitor readings and alarm histories
  • Inspection and maintenance records
  • Training materials and contractor agreements
  • Photographs, videos, and witness accounts
  • Burn patterns and damaged equipment
  • Electronic control-system data

These records can show who controlled the hazardous activity, who knew about the risk, and whether a safety step was skipped.

Can an Injured Worker File a Lawsuit?

The answer depends partly on whether the worker’s employer carries Texas workers’ compensation insurance. Coverage generally provides benefits while limiting lawsuits against the employer. An injured worker may still have a claim against a negligent third party, such as a site operator, contractor, or equipment manufacturer.

Texas also allows most private employers to operate without workers’ compensation coverage. Employees of these “nonsubscribers” may sue their employer for negligence and seek compensation beyond workers’ compensation benefits. The employer generally cannot argue that the worker assumed the risk, contributed to the accident, or was injured because of a coworker’s negligence. The worker must still prove that the employer’s negligence caused the injury.

Do Not Let the Cause of the Fire Disappear With the Evidence

After an oilfield fire or explosion, companies and insurers may begin investigating immediately. You deserve the same opportunity to understand what happened. Scott Scherr, a Board Certified personal injury attorney at The Payne Law Group, can act quickly to preserve evidence, examine the role of every company involved, and pursue compensation for your injuries and losses. Contact our firm for a free case review. One call is all it takes.

About the Author
Attorney Scott Scherr is a trial lawyer who is passionate about helping clients get the money they need and deserve. He represents clients in personal injury matters, complex business, and employment matters. Don’t “settle” for just any lawyer – there are a ton of lawyers out there who do the minimum amount of work possible just to settle your claims as quickly as they can, even if the settlement is not necessarily in your best interest. Those lawyers do not get you the amount of money you deserve – you are just another case they want to get off their desk so they can move on to the next one. Many of them are simply afraid to go to trial or to put in the effort to maximize the money you will get. This literally robs you of dollars that should be paid to you. We will give your case the attention it deserves and gets you the most money we can, even if it means more work and taking your case all the way to trial.